A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE TRAGIC HERO IN SHAKESPEARE’S HAMLET AND MILLER’S DEATH OF A SALESMAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20085245Keywords:
Tragic hero, Hamlet, Willy Loman, comparative analysis, modern drama, classical tragedy, internal conflict, Arthur Miller, William ShakespeareAbstract
This paper focuses on the creation of the tragic hero via Shakespeare's Hamlet in Arthur Miller’s Death of a Salesman. In this two-person study about Hamlet & Willy Loman, the study aims to engage with the evolution of tragedy as a cultural phenomenon from its classical origins to its contemporary manifestations. If Hamlet is the archetype of the classical Aristotelian tragic hero of nobility, moral conflict, and fatal flaw, then Willy Loman is representative of the new age re-creation of tragedy, an ordinary person pushed into the heart of a major dramatic event. The research employs a comparative and analytical approach in characterisation of the psychology, society and philosophy surrounding both characters. The struggle at the center of Hamlet with moral responsibility and existential doubt sharply contrasts with Willy Loman's confrontation with social expectations and personal illusions. Though socially ranked, historiographical events, and theatre forms are widely different, themes of human suffering, failure, searching for self, etc. and similar to each other, resonate with everyone on a larger scale. Finally, the conclusion is: tragedy is not confined to kings and princes; common man who, with dreams and reality always fight their way through this struggle. This suggests a shift in importance for literary values and a democratization of tragedy in current literature. The research sheds some light on this issue, particularly in its view of literature as being linked to historical or contemporary cultural and ideological conflicts, but also maintaining relevance relevant today.
Downloads
References
1.Aristotle. (1996). Poetics. Penguin Classics. pp. 3–50.
2.Bradley, A. C. (2005). Shakespearean Tragedy. Penguin Books. pp. 1–120.
3.Shakespeare, W. (2003). Hamlet. Oxford University Press. pp. 1–300.
4.Miller, A. (1998). Death of a Salesman. Penguin Books. pp. 1–150.
5.Miller, A. (1949). Tragedy and the Common Man. Viking Press. pp. 1–10.
6.Bloom, H. (2010). Hamlet: Poem Unlimited. Riverhead Books. pp. 20–200.
7.Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of Criticism. Princeton University Press. pp. 200–250.
8.Eagleton, T. (2003). Sweet Violence: The Idea of the Tragic. Blackwell. pp. 1–100.
9.Williams, R. (1966). Modern Tragedy. Stanford University Press. pp. 10–90.
10.Esslin, M. (1961). The Theatre of the Absurd. Anchor Books. pp. 50–120.
11.Bigsby, C. (2005). Arthur Miller: A Critical Study. Cambridge University Press. pp. 30–150.
12.Greenblatt, S. (2004). Will in the World. Norton. pp. 200–350.
13.Leech, C. (1964). Shakespeare’s Tragedies. Routledge. pp. 60–140.
14.Corrigan, R. (1983). Arthur Miller: A Collection of Critical Essays. Prentice Hall. pp. 1–80.
15.Parker, R. (1995). How to Interpret Literature. Oxford University Press. pp. 100–180.
16.Abrams, M. H. (1999). A Glossary of Literary Terms. Heinle. pp. 300–350.
17.Cuddon, J. A. (2013). Dictionary of Literary Terms. Penguin Books. pp. 700–750.
18.Lodge, D. (1998). Modern Criticism and Theory. Longman. pp. 120–200.
19.Wellek, R., & Warren, A. (1956). Theory of Literature. Harcourt. pp. 210–260.
20.Kernan, A. (1967). The Cankered Muse. Yale University Press. pp. 80–160.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India