THE HISTORICAL FORMATION OF ENGLISH TOPONYMS: ETYMOLOGICAL LAYERS, FORMANTS, AND CANONIZATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
historical toponymy, English toponyms, diachrony, etymology, formant, canonization, hydronym, oikonymAbstract
This article analyzes the historical formation of English place names from a diachronic perspective. Based on a revised corpus of English units from the original comparative study, the article examines Celtic, Latin, Old English, Scandinavian, and Anglo-Norman layers, mechanisms of phonetic-morphological adaptation, as well as the role of written and cartographic canonization. It is shown that hydronyms and the names of large settlements prove to be the most stable, whereas settlement suffixes such as -ham, -ton, -ford, -by, and -chester preserve the memory of specific stages of colonization and economic development of the territory. A model of the historical development of English toponyms is proposed: substrate – contact – adaptation – canonization. The practical value of this work relates to historical onomastics, regional history, and the standardization of geographical names.
Downloads
References
1.Artikova, L. S. (2024). Place names in English-Uzbek translations. Information Horizons: American Journal of Library and Information Science Innovation, 2(12), 66-69.
2.Edmonds, F., & Taylor, S. (2019). Languages and names. In K. J. Stringer & A. J. L. Winchester (Eds.), Northern England and Southern Scotland in the Central Middle Ages (pp. 137-172). Boydell & Brewer. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781787441521.005
3.Hausner, I. (2017). Etymology and the historic study of geographical names. In Manual for the national standardization of geographical names (Chapter 26, pp. 26-1-26-6). United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names.
4.Hoffmann, I. (2023). The source value of toponyms in history. In O. Felecan (Ed.), Onomastics in interaction with other branches of science (Vol. 1, pp. 7-21). Jagiellonian University Press.
5.Hough, C. (2015). Place-names and language. Babel: The Language Magazine, 10, 10-13.
6.Ibayev A. TOBE KOMPONENTLI MURAKKAB SINTAKTIK QURILMALARNING STRUKTUR XUSUSIYATLARI //ILM-FAN YANGILIKLARI KONFERENSIYASI. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 1. – С. 23.
7.Aнвар И. Тобе Компонентли Қиёсий Қурилмаларнинг Структур Хусусиятлари //International Conference on Multidimensional Research and Innovative Technological Analyses. – 2022. – С. 79-82.
8.Ibayev A. J. Comparative analysis of the derivation of simple sentences in English and Uzbek //International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology (IJRASET) ISSN. – С. 2321-9653.
9.Ibayev A. J. On the derivational features of corporate small syntactic structures //European multidisciplinary journal of modern science. ISSN. – С. 2750-6274.
10.Jo'rabekovich I. A. et al. THE MOST EFFECTIVE WAYS TO DEVELOP READING COMPREHENSION SKILLS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS //Shokh Articles Library. – 2026. – Т. 1. – №. 1.
11.Jo’rabekovich I. A., Isroilovna I. S. THE ROLE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN LEARNING FOREIGN LANGUAGES //Международный журнал научных исследователей. – 2025. – Т. 11. – №. 1. – С. 619-622.
12.Jo’rabekovich I. A., Isroilovna I. S. TRANSFORMING TRADITIONAL TEACHING METHODS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES //YANGI O ‘ZBEKISTON, YANGI TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI. – 2025. – Т. 2. – №. 7. – С. 953-958.
13.Ибаев А. Некоторые вопросы о деривации дубльоператорных придаточный предложений времени в узбекском языке //Зарубежная лингвистика и лингводидактика. – 2024. – Т. 2. – №. 3. – С. 350-356.
14.Ибаев А. Некоторые суждения о синтаксисе и современных концепциях //Переводоведение и лингвистика в эпоху цифровых технологий: изучение передовых подходов. – 2024. – Т. 1. – №. 1. – С. 18-21.
15.Ибаев А. Сравнительно-синтаксические примеры как объект изучения языкознания //Общество и инновации. – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 8/S. – С. 153-159.
16.Ibaev A. K voprosu polucheniya sravnitelnyh soedineniy //Ученый XXI века. – 2020. – №. 12-1 (71). – С. 101-103.
17.Kahnberg, M. (2020). English place-names from a Scandinavian perspective: A study on place-names in Herefordshire, Cumbria and the areas reachable by Viking ship through the Humber [Master's thesis, University of Gothenburg]. University of Gothenburg.
18.Lauder, M. R. M. T. (2017). Some aspects of cartographic and linguistic evidence in historical toponymy. In Manual for the national standardization of geographical names (Chapter 27, pp. 27-1-27-4). United Nations Group of Experts on Geographical Names.
19.Nyström, S. (2023). Francesco Perono Cacciafoco & Francesco Cavallaro, Place names: Approaches and perspectives in toponymy and toponomastics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023, 298 pp. Onoma, 58, 403-408. https://doi.org/10.34158/ONOMA.58/2023/29
20.Perono Cacciafoco, F., & Cavallaro, F. (2023). Historical toponomastics. In Place names (pp. 46-79). Cambridge University Press.
21.Perono Cacciafoco, F., & Cavallaro, F. (2023). Diachronic toponymy. In Place names (pp. 114-133). Cambridge University Press.
22.Perono Cacciafoco, F., & Cavallaro, F. (2023). Historical toponomastics and historical geography. In Place names (pp. 158-183). Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.
Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India
