DIFFERENCES BETWEEN AI-GENERATED ANALYSIS AND HUMAN ANALYSIS IN LITERARY WORKS

Abstract

This article examines the main differences between AI-generated literary analysis and human literary analysis. It shows that artificial intelligence can analyze texts quickly, identify themes, patterns, and emotional language, and compare large numbers of literary works. However, AI does not have real emotions, cultural intuition, or personal reading experience. Human literary analysis, in contrast, is strongly connected to emotion, imagination, cultural knowledge, and creative interpretation.
The study compares responses produced by three AI systems—ChatGPT, DeepSeek, and Google Gemini—using classic literary works such as Frankenstein, Testament of Youth, The Picture of Dorian Gray, and Wuthering Heights. The analysis demonstrates that although AI systems differ in their analytical methods, all of them lack genuine emotional experience and rely on language patterns and data. The article concludes that AI should be used as a supportive analytical tool in literary studies, while interpretation, emotional understanding, and meaning-making should remain the responsibility of human readers and scholars.