AUTOMATIC DIAGNOSTIC ALGORITHMS FOR STP CABLE PAIRS AND THEIR EFFICIENCY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
xAbstract
This article examines the algorithms used for automatic diagnostics of internal pairs in STP (Shielded Twisted Pair) cables, focusing on their operating principles, impact on network quality, and overall efficiency. In modern networks, error-free management of cable infrastructure is crucial. Therefore, algorithms capable of real-time monitoring, length detection, resistance measurement, NEXT/FEXT identification, and signal loss evaluation are analyzed. Experimental results show that automated diagnostic systems provide significantly higher accuracy compared to traditional manual testing methods.
Downloads
References
1.Behzad Razavi, RF Microelectronics, 2nd Edition, Pearson, 2012.
2.Stephen Bigelow, Cabling: The Complete Guide to Network Wiring, Sybex, 2016.
3.TIA/EIA-568-C.2 Standard, Balanced Twisted-Pair Cabling and Components, Telecommunications Industry Association, 2009.
4.Kaveh Pahlavan, Prashant Krishnamurthy, Principles of Wireless Access and Localization, Wiley, 2013.
5.S. Rajagopal, R. D. Gitlin, Time Domain Reflectometry: Theory and Applications, Springer, 2010.
6.J. D. Gibson, Digital Communications, 2nd Edition, Springer, 2008.
7.K. Gupta, A. Kumar, Artificial Intelligence Applications in Communication Networks, IEEE Communications Magazine, 2020; 58(6): 42–49.
8.M. Schwartz, Mobile Wireless Communications, Cambridge University Press, 2013.
9.R. Freeman, Fundamentals of Telecommunications, John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
10.IEEE Std 802.3-2018, IEEE Standard for Ethernet, IEEE, 2018.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India