A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HUMOROUS DIALOGUES IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES BASED ON SPEECH ACT THEORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Abstract
The essence of humor lies not only in the words with funny content but often in the specific pragmatic use of speech, i.e., in how it is said. Speech Act Theory, developed by J.L. Austin and J.R. Searle, emphasizes that speech is not only about conveying a certain meaning but also a means of performing a certain action. The speaker promises, asks, orders, curses, or casts a spell. In humorous speech, the standard use of these speech acts is violated, turned in an unexpected direction, or interpreted in a specific way, and it is this violation that serves as the main source of the comic effect.
Downloads
References
1.Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
2.Dynel, M. (2011). Blending the incongruity-resolution model and the conceptual integration theory: The case of humorous Internet films. In M. Dynel (Ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (pp. 83-102). John Benjamins Publishing.
3.Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. D. Reidel Publishing.
4.Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
5.Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 59–82). Academic Press.
6.Vandaele, J. (2002). Humor mechanisms in film comedy: Incongruity and superiority. Poetics Today, 23(2), 221-249.
7.Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. John Benjamins Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India