A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HUMOROUS DIALOGUES IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES BASED ON SPEECH ACT THEORY

Authors

  • Bektoshev Mubashirkhon Odilbek ugli EFL teacher at Kokand University Doctoral student of Kokand State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Abstract

The essence of humor lies not only in the words with funny content but often in the specific pragmatic use of speech, i.e., in how it is said. Speech Act Theory, developed by J.L. Austin and J.R. Searle, emphasizes that speech is not only about conveying a certain meaning but also a means of performing a certain action. The speaker promises, asks, orders, curses, or casts a spell. In humorous speech, the standard use of these speech acts is violated, turned in an unexpected direction, or interpreted in a specific way, and it is this violation that serves as the main source of the comic effect.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.

2.Dynel, M. (2011). Blending the incongruity-resolution model and the conceptual integration theory: The case of humorous Internet films. In M. Dynel (Ed.), The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains (pp. 83-102). John Benjamins Publishing.

3.Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. D. Reidel Publishing.

4.Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

5.Searle, J. R. (1975). Indirect speech acts. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts (pp. 59–82). Academic Press.

6.Vandaele, J. (2002). Humor mechanisms in film comedy: Incongruity and superiority. Poetics Today, 23(2), 221-249.

7.Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. John Benjamins Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-03

How to Cite

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF HUMOROUS DIALOGUES IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES BASED ON SPEECH ACT THEORY. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(8), 34-37. https://doi.org/10.55640/