AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT PRACTICES

Main Article Content

O'tkirova Latofat Sur'at kizi

Abstract

The overarching aim of this paper is to discuss some fundamental issues in second language assessment to provide classroom practitioners with knowledge to improve their test development skills. This research is to discuss some fundamental issues in language assessment to provide classroom practitioners with knowledge to improve their test development skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT PRACTICES. (2025). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 4(5), 666-670. https://doi.org/10.55640/

References

1.Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

2.Djorayeva M, Yuldashova N. (2022) The importance of using interactive methods in the process of teaching terminology/Pedagogs/Volume 8, Issue-1

3.Yuldashova N, Ziyodulloyeva M, Khudayberganova M, Madaminova S, Bakhronova M“Pecularities of using activities for raising students’ socio-cultural competence” / WebologyVolume 19,№16, pages 5047-5057, 2020.

4.Mochida, A., & Harrington, M. (2006). The Yes/No test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 23, 73-98.

5.Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 209-227.

6.Read, J., & Chapelle, C.A. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 18, 1-32.

7.Schoonen, R., & Verhallen, M. (in press). The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners. To appear in Language Testing.