AN EMPIRICAL STUDY ON LANGUAGE ASSESSMENT PRACTICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55640/Keywords:
xAbstract
The overarching aim of this paper is to discuss some fundamental issues in second language assessment to provide classroom practitioners with knowledge to improve their test development skills. This research is to discuss some fundamental issues in language assessment to provide classroom practitioners with knowledge to improve their test development skills.
Downloads
References
1.Bachman, L., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.Djorayeva M, Yuldashova N. (2022) The importance of using interactive methods in the process of teaching terminology/Pedagogs/Volume 8, Issue-1
3.Yuldashova N, Ziyodulloyeva M, Khudayberganova M, Madaminova S, Bakhronova M“Pecularities of using activities for raising students’ socio-cultural competence” / WebologyVolume 19,№16, pages 5047-5057, 2020.
4.Mochida, A., & Harrington, M. (2006). The Yes/No test as a measure of receptive vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 23, 73-98.
5.Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition and testing. Amsterdam: Benjamins, pp. 209-227.
6.Read, J., & Chapelle, C.A. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 18, 1-32.
7.Schoonen, R., & Verhallen, M. (in press). The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners. To appear in Language Testing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India