THE INFLUENCE OF LEADERSHIP STYLES IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS ON TEACHERS' PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19968787Keywords:
leadership style, teacher activity, human factor, pedagogical management, authoritarian style, democratic style, professional motivation, quality of education.Abstract
This article provides a scientific and theoretical analysis of the influence of various leadership styles used in educational institutions on teachers' professional activity, career development and psychological environment. Goal-oriented, democratic and liberal leadership styles are comparatively studied, and the superiority of the human-factor-based approach is substantiated. The research findings show that the correct selection of a leadership style significantly increases teachers' professional satisfaction, creative activity and pedagogical effectiveness.
Downloads
References
1.Lewin K. Dynamic Psychology. — Moscow: Smysl, 2001. — 572 p.
2.McGregor D. The Human Side of Enterprise. — New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960. — 246 p.
3.Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Education". — Tashkent, 2020.
4.Herzberg F. Work and the Nature of Man. — Cleveland: World Publishing, 1966. — 203 p.
5.Edmondson A. The Fearless Organization. — New Jersey: Wiley, 2018. — 256 p.
6.Shamiyev I.I., Nazarov Sh.A. Foundations of Pedagogical Management. — Tashkent: Fan, 2019. — 184 p.
7.Kholiqov A.A. Management Culture in the Education System. — Tashkent: TSPU, 2021. — 112 p.
8.Yukl G. Leadership in Organizations. 8th ed. — Boston: Pearson, 2013. — 532 p.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

Germany
United States of America
Italy
United Kingdom
France
Canada
Uzbekistan
Japan
Republic of Korea
Australia
Spain
Switzerland
Sweden
Netherlands
China
India