TERRITORIAL AFFILIATION OF THE SUBJECT IN LEGAL DISCOURSE AND ITS PRAGMATIC-LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS (A Comparative Study Based on Age-Related Oral Discourses)

Authors

  • Kholida Ubaydullayeva Manopovna Lecturer, Asia International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55640/

Keywords:

legal discourse, subject, territorial affiliation, pragmalinguistics, discourse analysis, institutional subject, chronotope, spontaneous oral speech, age-related discourse, legal language

Abstract

This article examines the territorial affiliation of the subject in legal discourse from a pragmalinguistic perspective. The study aims to identify the role of territorial parameters in shaping the subject and ensuring the normative force of legal statements. Legal discourse is analyzed in comparison with spontaneous oral discourse, which makes it possible to trace the formation of the concepts of subject and territory at different age stages. The results demonstrate that territorial affiliation is a key pragmatic factor that defines the scope of the subject’s authority and reinforces the binding nature of legal norms. The findings contribute to theoretical and applied research in the fields of legal linguistics, pragmalinguistics, and discourse analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Ковалева, Л. М. (2008). Английская грамматика: предложение и слово. Иркутск.

2.Ubaydullayeva, K. M. (2025, March 15). Modern digital technologies in education: Problems and prospects. International Online Conference: Subject in Legal Discourse (pp. 6–9).

3.Ubaydullayeva, K. M. (2025). Linguistic means reflecting the subject in legal discourse. International Journal of Academic Innovation, 535–540.

4.Ubaydullayeva, K. M. (2025). Factors of subject representation in the legal discourse of the Uzbek language. Global Conferences, 128–131.

5.Ubaydullayeva, K. M. (2025). Legal discourse as a type of specialized discourse: Scientific and practical research of Uzbek scholars. Scientific-Theoretical and Methodological Journal, 6(18), 103–108.

6.Ubaydullayeva, K. M. (2025). Legal discourse — A type of specialized discourse (pp. 532–537).

7.Ubaydullayeva, K. M. (2025, June). The study of legal discourse: International and Uzbek linguistic experience. Bulletin of Science, 6.

8.Пардаев, З. (2013). Прагматик лингвистика: Ўқув-услубий қўлланма. Самарканд.

9.Раупова, Л. (2011). Диалогик нутқнинг дискурсив талқини. Тошкент: Ўзбекистон фанлар академияси «Fan».

10.Седов, К. Ф. (2004). Дискурс и личность: эволюция коммуникативной компетенции. Москва: Лабиринт.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-09

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 02 (2026): Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are disseminated under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC-BY), which licenses unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is appropriately cited. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations.

How to Cite

TERRITORIAL AFFILIATION OF THE SUBJECT IN LEGAL DISCOURSE AND ITS PRAGMATIC-LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS (A Comparative Study Based on Age-Related Oral Discourses). (2026). Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 5(02), 650-654. https://doi.org/10.55640/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 2715

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.